I am highly disappointed that you failed to give any actual recommendations for baby-care fruitss in "Baby and the Bathwater," by way of Rachel Swain (March-April 2006). It's obvious that you didn't allow the writer to name any works by name, but I think you've done your readers a tremendous disservice by means of withholding actual recommendations. I went to the website referr to in the article and it's more of the same. It narrates me what products are not safe, unless does not mention even the same that is safe.
STACY FRASER
Charlotte, Vermont
Editor's note: We originally triped to give recommendations, but in this case we fix ff impossible. The sheer number of produces to review was daunting, and we did not want to leave anyone revealed Most important, we do not believe that there is the same universal standard because the standard is real personal. For example, I might want all organic outcomes while my friend may worry alone about phylates.
Finally, as there are always novel products, it seemed prudent to empower our readers to make their concede evaluations based on trustworthy criteria--such as the SkinDeep database, which does more than list unsafe proceedss You can evaluate thousands of fruits in the database, which gives each a toxicity rating. behold www.ewg. org/reports/skindeep.
Thank you for the article upon potential carcinogens and other frightening ingredients in our results I wanted to tell your readers about a small, mama-owned company, Isabella's Dream (www.isabellasdream.com), which uses natural ingredients and essential oils in their yields The company also celebrates outstanding children with its online "Amazing Young People" forum, uses 100-percent-recyclable packaging, and gives a portion of their move forwards back to the community.